Penalization and shrinkage methods produced unreliable clinical prediction models especially when sample size was small
<br><strong>Objectives<br></strong> When developing a clinical prediction model, penalization techniques are recommended to address overfitting, as they shrink predictor effect estimates toward the null and reduce mean-square prediction error in new individuals. However, shri...
Main Authors: | Riley, RD, Snell, KIE, Martin, GP, Whittle, R, Archer, L, Sperrin, M, Collins, GS |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Similar Items
-
Developing clinical prediction models when adhering to minimum sample size recommendations: the importance of quantifying bootstrap variability in tuning parameters and predictive performance
by: Martin, GP, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a continuous outcome
by: Archer, L, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome
by: Riley, RD, et al.
Published: (2021) -
External validation of clinical prediction models: simulation-based sample size calculations were more reliable than rules-of-thumb
by: Snell, KIE, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Targeted validation: validating clinical prediction models in their intended population and setting
by: Sperrin, M, et al.
Published: (2022)