Why do authors derive new cardiovascular clinical prediction rules in the presence of existing rules? A mixed methods study
Background <br/> Researchers should examine existing evidence to determine the need for a new study. It is unknown whether developers evaluate existing evidence to justify new cardiovascular clinical prediction rules (CPRs). <br/><br/> Objective <br/> We aimed to assess wheth...
| Päätekijät: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Aineistotyyppi: | Journal article |
| Kieli: | English |
| Julkaistu: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|