Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling versus No Peeling for Idiopathic Full-Thickness Macular Hole: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
Autores principales: | Lois, N, Burr, J, Norrie, J, Vale, L, Cook, J, McDonald, A, Boachie, C, Ternent, L, McPherson, G |
---|---|
Formato: | Journal article |
Publicado: |
2011
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of internal limiting membrane peeling for patients with idiopathic full thickness macular hole. Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial: FILMS (Full-thickness macular hole and Internal Limiting Membrane peeling Study)
por: Lois, N, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of internal limiting membrane peeling for patients with idiopathic full thickness macular hole. Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial: FILMS (Full-thickness macular hole and Internal Limiting Membrane peeling Study)
por: Cook Jonathan, et al.
Publicado: (2008-11-01) -
Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling versus No Peeling for Idiopathic Full-Thickness Macular Hole
por: Spiteri Cornish, K, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling versus vitrectomy with no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH)
por: Spiteri Cornish, K, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Inverted ILM peeling for idiopathic and other etiology macular holes
por: Mahesh P Shanmugam, et al.
Publicado: (2014-01-01)