Electronic structures of Pd(II) dimers.

The Pd(II) dimers [(2-phenylpyridine)Pd(mu-X)](2) and [(2-p-tolylpyridine)Pd(mu-X)](2) (X = OAc or TFA) do not exhibit the expected planar geometry (of approximate D(2h) symmetry) but instead resemble an open "clamshell" in which the acetate ligands are perpendicular to the plane containin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bercaw, J, Durrell, A, Gray, H, Green, J, Hazari, N, Labinger, J, Winkler, JR
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2010
_version_ 1797088053294006272
author Bercaw, J
Durrell, A
Gray, H
Green, J
Hazari, N
Labinger, J
Winkler, JR
author_facet Bercaw, J
Durrell, A
Gray, H
Green, J
Hazari, N
Labinger, J
Winkler, JR
author_sort Bercaw, J
collection OXFORD
description The Pd(II) dimers [(2-phenylpyridine)Pd(mu-X)](2) and [(2-p-tolylpyridine)Pd(mu-X)](2) (X = OAc or TFA) do not exhibit the expected planar geometry (of approximate D(2h) symmetry) but instead resemble an open "clamshell" in which the acetate ligands are perpendicular to the plane containing the Pd atoms and 2-arylpyridine ligands, with the Pd atoms brought quite close to one another (approximate distance 2.85 A). The molecules adopt this unusual geometry in part because of a d(8)-d(8) bonding interaction between the two Pd centers. The Pd-Pd dimers exhibit two successive one-electron oxidations: Pd(II)-Pd(II) to Pd(II)-Pd(III) to Pd(III)-Pd(III). Photophysical measurements reveal clear differences in the UV-visible and low-temperature fluorescence spectra between the clamshell dimers and related planar dimeric [(2-phenylpyridine)Pd(mu-Cl)](2) and monomeric [(2-phenylpyridine)Pd(en)][Cl] (en = ethylenediamine) complexes that do not have any close Pd-Pd contacts. Density functional theory and atoms in molecules analyses confirm the presence of a Pd-Pd bonding interaction in [(2-phenylpyridine)Pd(mu-X)](2) and show that the highest occupied molecular orbital is a d(z(2)) sigma* Pd-Pd antibonding orbital, while the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital and close-lying empty orbitals are mainly located on the 2-phenylpyridine rings. Computational analyses of other Pd(II)-Pd(II) dimers that have short Pd-Pd distances yield an orbital ordering similar to that of [(2-phenylpyridine)Pd(mu-X)](2), but quite different from that found for d(8)-d(8) dimers of Rh, Ir, and Pt. This difference in orbital ordering arises because of the unusually large energy gap between the 4d and 5p orbitals in Pd and may explain why Pd d(8)-d(8) dimers do not exhibit the distinctive photophysical properties of related Rh, Ir, and Pt species.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:44:24Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ab8c33ec-9d62-4a84-a446-a8de4bc43238
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:44:24Z
publishDate 2010
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ab8c33ec-9d62-4a84-a446-a8de4bc432382022-03-27T03:22:44ZElectronic structures of Pd(II) dimers.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ab8c33ec-9d62-4a84-a446-a8de4bc43238EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2010Bercaw, JDurrell, AGray, HGreen, JHazari, NLabinger, JWinkler, JRThe Pd(II) dimers [(2-phenylpyridine)Pd(mu-X)](2) and [(2-p-tolylpyridine)Pd(mu-X)](2) (X = OAc or TFA) do not exhibit the expected planar geometry (of approximate D(2h) symmetry) but instead resemble an open "clamshell" in which the acetate ligands are perpendicular to the plane containing the Pd atoms and 2-arylpyridine ligands, with the Pd atoms brought quite close to one another (approximate distance 2.85 A). The molecules adopt this unusual geometry in part because of a d(8)-d(8) bonding interaction between the two Pd centers. The Pd-Pd dimers exhibit two successive one-electron oxidations: Pd(II)-Pd(II) to Pd(II)-Pd(III) to Pd(III)-Pd(III). Photophysical measurements reveal clear differences in the UV-visible and low-temperature fluorescence spectra between the clamshell dimers and related planar dimeric [(2-phenylpyridine)Pd(mu-Cl)](2) and monomeric [(2-phenylpyridine)Pd(en)][Cl] (en = ethylenediamine) complexes that do not have any close Pd-Pd contacts. Density functional theory and atoms in molecules analyses confirm the presence of a Pd-Pd bonding interaction in [(2-phenylpyridine)Pd(mu-X)](2) and show that the highest occupied molecular orbital is a d(z(2)) sigma* Pd-Pd antibonding orbital, while the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital and close-lying empty orbitals are mainly located on the 2-phenylpyridine rings. Computational analyses of other Pd(II)-Pd(II) dimers that have short Pd-Pd distances yield an orbital ordering similar to that of [(2-phenylpyridine)Pd(mu-X)](2), but quite different from that found for d(8)-d(8) dimers of Rh, Ir, and Pt. This difference in orbital ordering arises because of the unusually large energy gap between the 4d and 5p orbitals in Pd and may explain why Pd d(8)-d(8) dimers do not exhibit the distinctive photophysical properties of related Rh, Ir, and Pt species.
spellingShingle Bercaw, J
Durrell, A
Gray, H
Green, J
Hazari, N
Labinger, J
Winkler, JR
Electronic structures of Pd(II) dimers.
title Electronic structures of Pd(II) dimers.
title_full Electronic structures of Pd(II) dimers.
title_fullStr Electronic structures of Pd(II) dimers.
title_full_unstemmed Electronic structures of Pd(II) dimers.
title_short Electronic structures of Pd(II) dimers.
title_sort electronic structures of pd ii dimers
work_keys_str_mv AT bercawj electronicstructuresofpdiidimers
AT durrella electronicstructuresofpdiidimers
AT grayh electronicstructuresofpdiidimers
AT greenj electronicstructuresofpdiidimers
AT hazarin electronicstructuresofpdiidimers
AT labingerj electronicstructuresofpdiidimers
AT winklerjr electronicstructuresofpdiidimers