Wrongdoing by results: Moore's experiential argument
Michael Moore and I agree about the moral importance of how our actions turn out. We even agree about some of the arguments that establish that moral importance. In Causation and Responsibility, however, Moore foregrounds one argument that I do not find persuasive or even helpful. In fact I doubt wh...
Hoofdauteur: | Gardner, J |
---|---|
Formaat: | Journal article |
Taal: | English |
Gepubliceerd in: |
Cambridge University Press
2012
|
Gelijkaardige items
-
The wrongdoing that gets results
door: Gardner, J
Gepubliceerd in: (2004) -
Chasing the Elusive Wrongdoing Intuition
door: David Wasserman
Gepubliceerd in: (2020-02-01) -
Ordinary wrongdoing and responsibility worth wanting
door: Maureen Sie
Gepubliceerd in: (2005-01-01) -
The place of fault in Grotius's conception of liability for wrongdoing
door: Sampson, J
Gepubliceerd in: (2021) -
The limits of natural law: liability for wrongdoing in the Inleidinge
door: Sampson, J
Gepubliceerd in: (2019)