Wrongdoing by results: Moore's experiential argument
Michael Moore and I agree about the moral importance of how our actions turn out. We even agree about some of the arguments that establish that moral importance. In Causation and Responsibility, however, Moore foregrounds one argument that I do not find persuasive or even helpful. In fact I doubt wh...
Autor principal: | Gardner, J |
---|---|
Formato: | Journal article |
Idioma: | English |
Publicado em: |
Cambridge University Press
2012
|
Registos relacionados
-
The wrongdoing that gets results
Por: Gardner, J
Publicado em: (2004) -
Chasing the Elusive Wrongdoing Intuition
Por: David Wasserman
Publicado em: (2020-02-01) -
Ordinary wrongdoing and responsibility worth wanting
Por: Maureen Sie
Publicado em: (2005-01-01) -
The place of fault in Grotius's conception of liability for wrongdoing
Por: Sampson, J
Publicado em: (2021) -
The limits of natural law: liability for wrongdoing in the Inleidinge
Por: Sampson, J
Publicado em: (2019)