Wrongdoing by results: Moore's experiential argument
Michael Moore and I agree about the moral importance of how our actions turn out. We even agree about some of the arguments that establish that moral importance. In Causation and Responsibility, however, Moore foregrounds one argument that I do not find persuasive or even helpful. In fact I doubt wh...
Главный автор: | Gardner, J |
---|---|
Формат: | Journal article |
Язык: | English |
Опубликовано: |
Cambridge University Press
2012
|
Схожие документы
-
The wrongdoing that gets results
по: Gardner, J
Опубликовано: (2004) -
Chasing the Elusive Wrongdoing Intuition
по: David Wasserman
Опубликовано: (2020-02-01) -
Ordinary wrongdoing and responsibility worth wanting
по: Maureen Sie
Опубликовано: (2005-01-01) -
The place of fault in Grotius's conception of liability for wrongdoing
по: Sampson, J
Опубликовано: (2021) -
The limits of natural law: liability for wrongdoing in the Inleidinge
по: Sampson, J
Опубликовано: (2019)