Supermajority voting rules: balancing commitment and flexibility
When optimal policymaking is subject to dynamic inconsistencies (Kydland and Prescott, 1977), but shocks hit the economy after private agents form expectations, there is a trade off between the need to commit to a policy, and the need to retain discretion so as to respond to shocks. Rogoff (1985) sh...
Main Author: | Bo, E |
---|---|
Format: | Working paper |
Published: |
University of Oxford
2002
|
Similar Items
-
Supermajority Voting Rules: Balancing Commitment and Flexibility.
by: Bó, E
Published: (2002) -
The case for supermajority requirements in referendums
by: Qvortrup, M, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Case study, dynamic capabilities and upstream strategy: Supermajor EXP
by: Paul Feiler, et al.
Published: (2014-09-01) -
Strengthening the Legitimacy of the Indonesian Constitutional Court Decision through Supermajority Requirement: Lesson from the South Korean Experience
by: Tri Sulistyowati, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
BatchVote: Voting Rules Designed for Auditability
by: Rivest, Ronald L, et al.
Published: (2020)