Validity of indirect comparisons in meta-analysis.

Validity of indirect comparisons in meta-analysis.

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Cipriani, A, Furukawa, T, Churchill, R, Barbui, C
Format:	Journal article
Language:	English
Published:	2007

Similar Items

Quantifying indirect evidence in network meta-analysis
by: Noma, H, et al.
Published: (2016)

Efficacy and tolerability of milnacipran in the treatment of major depression in comparison with other antidepressants : a systematic review and meta-analysis.
by: Nakagawa, A, et al.
Published: (2008)

Relationship between quality of reports of antidepressant randomized controlled trials and treatment estimates: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis.
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2007)

Safety reporting and adverse-event profile of mirtazapine described in randomized controlled trials in comparison with other classes of antidepressants in the acute-phase treatment of adults with depression: systematic review and meta-analysis.
by: Watanabe, N, et al.
Published: (2010)

Efficacy, tolerability and side-effect profile of fluvoxamine for major depression: meta-analysis.
by: Omori, I, et al.
Published: (2009)

Mirtazapine versus other antidepressants in the acute-phase treatment of adults with major depression: systematic review and meta-analysis.
by: Watanabe, N, et al.
Published: (2008)

What is an individual patient data meta-analysis?
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2007)

Does randomized evidence support sertraline as first-line antidepressant for adults with acute major depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2008)

Imputing response rates from means and standard deviations in meta-analyses.
by: Furukawa, T, et al.
Published: (2005)

Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results.
by: Furukawa, T, et al.
Published: (2006)

Side-effect profile of fluoxetine in comparison with other SSRIs, tricyclic and newer antidepressants: a meta-analysis of clinical trial data.
by: Brambilla, P, et al.
Published: (2005)

Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression.
by: Watanabe, N, et al.
Published: (2011)

Effectiveness of paroxetine in the treatment of acute major depression in adults: a systematic re-examination of published and unpublished data from randomized trials.
by: Barbui, C, et al.
Published: (2008)

What is a Cochrane review?
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2011)

Effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors - Response
by: Barbui, C, et al.
Published: (2008)

Efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological treatments for personality disorders: A meta-analysis
by: Nose, M, et al.
Published: (2005)

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis.
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2009)

What is a multiple treatments meta-analysis?
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2012)

Antipsychotic drug exposure and risk of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
by: Barbui, C, et al.
Published: (2014)

Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for depression.
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2009)

Why internal and external validity of experimental studies are relevant for clinical practice?
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2009)

Metareview on short-term effectiveness and safety of antidepressants for depression: an evidence-based approach to inform clinical practice.
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2007)

Depressive disorder needs an evidence base commensurate with its public health importance.
by: Geddes, J, et al.
Published: (2007)

Long-term treatment of depression with antidepressants: a systematic narrative review.
by: Furukawa, T, et al.
Published: (2007)

Sertraline versus other antidepressive agents for depression.
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2009)

Sertraline versus other antidepressive agents for depression.
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2010)

Sertraline versus other antidepressive agents for depression
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2010)

Milnacipran versus other antidepressive agents for depression.
by: Nakagawa, A, et al.
Published: (2009)

Fluvoxamine versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.
by: Omori, I, et al.
Published: (2010)

Citalopram versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2012)

Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses.
by: Song, F, et al.
Published: (2003)

Indirect comparison meta-analysis of aspirin therapy after coronary surgery.
by: Lim, E, et al.
Published: (2003)

[Randomized trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses: basic criteria in the world of scientific evidence].
by: Purgato, M, et al.
Published: (2012)

Antidepressants, benzodiazepines and azapirones for panic disorder in adults: A network meta-analysis
by: Guaiana, G, et al.
Published: (2017)

Agomelatine efficacy and acceptability revisited: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomised trials.
by: Koesters, M, et al.
Published: (2013)

Metastatic renal cell cancer treatments: An indirect comparison meta-analysis
by: O'Regan Chris, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01)

What is an intention to treat analysis?
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2008)

Validity of the impact factor of journals as a measure of randomized controlled trial quality.
by: Barbui, C, et al.
Published: (2006)

Ranking antidepressants Reply
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2009)

Network meta-analysis: a technique to gather evidence from direct and indirect comparisons
by: Tonin FS, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01)