Peer review process: Assessments by applicant-nominated referees are biased, inflated, unreliable and invalid
How trustworthy are peer reviews by applicant-nominated assessors (ANAs)? For Australian Research Council (ARC) proposals (N = 2,330) with at least one ANA and one assessor nominated by the funding panel (PNAs), ANAs gave substantially higher ratings in all nine discipline panels (covering sciences,...
Main Authors: | Marsh, H, Bonds, N, Jayasinghe, U |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Sprog: | English |
Udgivet: |
2007
|
Lignende værker
-
Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.
af: Marsh, H, et al.
Udgivet: (2008) -
Tests for publication bias are unreliable in case of heteroscedasticity
af: Osama Almalik, et al.
Udgivet: (2021-06-01) -
Nominal Wage Rigidity and the Rate of Inflation.
af: Nickell, S, et al.
Udgivet: (2003) -
Nominal Wage Rigidity and the Rate of Inflation.
af: Nickell, S, et al.
Udgivet: (2001) -
Exchange Rates, Nominal Inertia and Inflation.
af: Ireland, J, et al.
Udgivet: (1998)