Peer review process: Assessments by applicant-nominated referees are biased, inflated, unreliable and invalid

How trustworthy are peer reviews by applicant-nominated assessors (ANAs)? For Australian Research Council (ARC) proposals (N = 2,330) with at least one ANA and one assessor nominated by the funding panel (PNAs), ANAs gave substantially higher ratings in all nine discipline panels (covering sciences,...

Полное описание

Библиографические подробности
Главные авторы: Marsh, H, Bonds, N, Jayasinghe, U
Формат: Journal article
Язык:English
Опубликовано: 2007

Схожие документы