Peer review process: Assessments by applicant-nominated referees are biased, inflated, unreliable and invalid
How trustworthy are peer reviews by applicant-nominated assessors (ANAs)? For Australian Research Council (ARC) proposals (N = 2,330) with at least one ANA and one assessor nominated by the funding panel (PNAs), ANAs gave substantially higher ratings in all nine discipline panels (covering sciences,...
Главные авторы: | Marsh, H, Bonds, N, Jayasinghe, U |
---|---|
Формат: | Journal article |
Язык: | English |
Опубликовано: |
2007
|
Схожие документы
-
Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.
по: Marsh, H, и др.
Опубликовано: (2008) -
Tests for publication bias are unreliable in case of heteroscedasticity
по: Osama Almalik, и др.
Опубликовано: (2021-06-01) -
Nominal Wage Rigidity and the Rate of Inflation.
по: Nickell, S, и др.
Опубликовано: (2003) -
Nominal Wage Rigidity and the Rate of Inflation.
по: Nickell, S, и др.
Опубликовано: (2001) -
Exchange Rates, Nominal Inertia and Inflation.
по: Ireland, J, и др.
Опубликовано: (1998)