Assessing proportionality in capital cases: a case study of Ohio
<p>When the United States Supreme Court approved the reinstatement of the death penalty in the United States in 1976, it did so based on the promise of new safeguards against comparative excessiveness and relative disproportionality resulting from jury sentencing in capital cases. As Justice...
Huvudupphovsman: | Berry III, WW |
---|---|
Övriga upphovsmän: | Hoyle, C |
Materialtyp: | Lärdomsprov |
Språk: | English |
Publicerad: |
2011
|
Ämnen: |
Liknande verk
-
An investigation of clemency and pardons in death penalty cases in Southeast Asia from 1975-2009
av: Pascoe, D, et al.
Publicerad: (2013) -
Fatal distraction: does the Texas capital sentencing statute discourage the consideration of mitigating evidence?
av: Vartkessian, E
Publicerad: (2011) -
Individualization of punishment in the context of the public’s fear of crime
av: Konyakhin Vladimir Pavlovich, et al.
Publicerad: (2021-01-01) -
The responsible man: a study in two private prisons
av: Eser, S
Publicerad: (2014) -
Correction of miscarriages of justice in New Zealand and England
av: Birdling, M, et al.
Publicerad: (2012)