Peer reviewers identified spin in manuscripts of nonrandomized studies assessing therapeutic interventions, but their impact on spin in abstract conclusions was limited
<h4>Objective</h4> <p>Spin is defined as a specific way of reporting, whether intentional or unintentional, to emphasize that the beneficial effect of the intervention is greater than that shown by the results. Our aim was to describe the spin identified, deleted or added by peer r...
Principais autores: | Lazarus, C, Haneef, R, Ravaud, P, Hopewell, S, Altman, D, Boutron, I |
---|---|
Formato: | Journal article |
Idioma: | English |
Publicado em: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Registros relacionados
-
Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial.
por: Boutron, I, et al.
Publicado em: (2014) -
Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial
por: Yavchitz, A, et al.
Publicado em: (2014) -
A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity
por: Yavchitz, A, et al.
Publicado em: (2016) -
Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis.
por: Hopewell, S, et al.
Publicado em: (2012) -
Effect of editors’ implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis
por: Hopewell, S, et al.
Publicado em: (2012)