Peer reviewers identified spin in manuscripts of nonrandomized studies assessing therapeutic interventions, but their impact on spin in abstract conclusions was limited
<h4>Objective</h4> <p>Spin is defined as a specific way of reporting, whether intentional or unintentional, to emphasize that the beneficial effect of the intervention is greater than that shown by the results. Our aim was to describe the spin identified, deleted or added by peer r...
Главные авторы: | Lazarus, C, Haneef, R, Ravaud, P, Hopewell, S, Altman, D, Boutron, I |
---|---|
Формат: | Journal article |
Язык: | English |
Опубликовано: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Схожие документы
-
Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial.
по: Boutron, I, и др.
Опубликовано: (2014) -
Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial
по: Yavchitz, A, и др.
Опубликовано: (2014) -
A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity
по: Yavchitz, A, и др.
Опубликовано: (2016) -
Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis.
по: Hopewell, S, и др.
Опубликовано: (2012) -
Effect of editors’ implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis
по: Hopewell, S, и др.
Опубликовано: (2012)