Raqeeb, Haastrup and Evans: seeking consistency through a distributive justice-based, approach to limitation of treatment in the context of dispute
When is life-sustaining treatment not in the best interests of a minimally conscious child? This is an extremely difficult question that incites seemingly intractable debate. And yet, it is the question courts in England and Wales have set out to answer in disputes about appropriate medical treatmen...
Principais autores: | Cameron, J, Savulescu, J, Wilkinson, DJC |
---|---|
Formato: | Journal article |
Idioma: | English |
Publicado em: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Registros relacionados
-
Disagreement, mediation, arbitration: resolving disputes about medical treatment
por: Wilkinson, DJC, et al.
Publicado em: (2018) -
Alfie Evans and Charlie Gard-should the law change?
por: Wilkinson, D, et al.
Publicado em: (2018) -
Re‐evaluating ‘best interests’ in the wake of Raqeeb v Barts NHS Foundation Trust & Anors
por: Auckland, C, et al.
Publicado em: (2020) -
Positive or negative? Consistency and inconsistency in claims of conscience
por: Wilkinson, DJC
Publicado em: (2020) -
In Conversation with: JCMS Editors Past and Present: Maxine David speaks to Simon Bulmer and Toni Haastrup
por: UACES
Publicado em: (2017-12-01)