Raqeeb, Haastrup and Evans: seeking consistency through a distributive justice-based, approach to limitation of treatment in the context of dispute
When is life-sustaining treatment not in the best interests of a minimally conscious child? This is an extremely difficult question that incites seemingly intractable debate. And yet, it is the question courts in England and Wales have set out to answer in disputes about appropriate medical treatmen...
Автори: | Cameron, J, Savulescu, J, Wilkinson, DJC |
---|---|
Формат: | Journal article |
Мова: | English |
Опубліковано: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Схожі ресурси
Схожі ресурси
-
Disagreement, mediation, arbitration: resolving disputes about medical treatment
за авторством: Wilkinson, DJC, та інші
Опубліковано: (2018) -
Alfie Evans and Charlie Gard-should the law change?
за авторством: Wilkinson, D, та інші
Опубліковано: (2018) -
Re‐evaluating ‘best interests’ in the wake of Raqeeb v Barts NHS Foundation Trust & Anors
за авторством: Auckland, C, та інші
Опубліковано: (2020) -
Positive or negative? Consistency and inconsistency in claims of conscience
за авторством: Wilkinson, DJC
Опубліковано: (2020) -
In Conversation with: JCMS Editors Past and Present: Maxine David speaks to Simon Bulmer and Toni Haastrup
за авторством: UACES
Опубліковано: (2017-12-01)