The costs of close contacts: visualizing the energy landscape of cell contacts at the nanoscale

Cell-cell contacts often underpin signaling between cells. For immunology, the binding of a T cell receptor to an antigen-presenting pMHC initiates downstream signaling and an immune response. Although this contact is mediated by proteins on both cells creating interfaces with gap sizes typically ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kulenkampff, K, Lippert, AH, McColl, J, Santos, AF, Ponjavic, A, Jenkins, E, Humphrey, J, Winkel, A, Franze, K, Lee, SF, Davis, SJ, Klenerman, D
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020
_version_ 1826297616812474368
author Kulenkampff, K
Lippert, AH
McColl, J
Santos, AF
Ponjavic, A
Jenkins, E
Humphrey, J
Winkel, A
Franze, K
Lee, SF
Davis, SJ
Klenerman, D
author_facet Kulenkampff, K
Lippert, AH
McColl, J
Santos, AF
Ponjavic, A
Jenkins, E
Humphrey, J
Winkel, A
Franze, K
Lee, SF
Davis, SJ
Klenerman, D
author_sort Kulenkampff, K
collection OXFORD
description Cell-cell contacts often underpin signaling between cells. For immunology, the binding of a T cell receptor to an antigen-presenting pMHC initiates downstream signaling and an immune response. Although this contact is mediated by proteins on both cells creating interfaces with gap sizes typically around 14 nm, many, often contradictory observations have been made regarding the influence of the contact on parameters such as the binding kinetics, spatial distribution, and diffusion of signaling proteins within the contact. Understanding the basic physical constraints on probes inside this crowded environment will help inform studies on binding kinetics and dynamics of signaling of relevant proteins in the synapse. By tracking quantum dots of different dimensions for extended periods of time, we have shown that it is possible to obtain the probability of a molecule entering the contact, the change in its diffusion upon entry, and the impact of spatial heterogeneity of adhesion protein density in the contact. By analyzing the contacts formed by a T cell interacting with adhesion proteins anchored to a supported lipid bilayer, we find that probes are excluded from contact entry in a size-dependent manner for gap-to-probe differences of 4.1 nm. We also observed probes being trapped inside the contact and a decrease in diffusion of up to 85% in dense adhesion protein contacts. This approach provides new, to our knowledge, insights into the nature of cell-cell contacts, revealing that cell contacts are highly heterogeneous because of topography- and protein-density-related processes. These effects are likely to profoundly influence signaling between cells.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:34:22Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:cf70cd8d-d8b5-4201-85d1-51fa0f60e50d
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:34:22Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:cf70cd8d-d8b5-4201-85d1-51fa0f60e50d2022-03-27T07:42:33ZThe costs of close contacts: visualizing the energy landscape of cell contacts at the nanoscaleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:cf70cd8d-d8b5-4201-85d1-51fa0f60e50dEnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2020Kulenkampff, KLippert, AHMcColl, JSantos, AFPonjavic, AJenkins, EHumphrey, JWinkel, AFranze, KLee, SFDavis, SJKlenerman, DCell-cell contacts often underpin signaling between cells. For immunology, the binding of a T cell receptor to an antigen-presenting pMHC initiates downstream signaling and an immune response. Although this contact is mediated by proteins on both cells creating interfaces with gap sizes typically around 14 nm, many, often contradictory observations have been made regarding the influence of the contact on parameters such as the binding kinetics, spatial distribution, and diffusion of signaling proteins within the contact. Understanding the basic physical constraints on probes inside this crowded environment will help inform studies on binding kinetics and dynamics of signaling of relevant proteins in the synapse. By tracking quantum dots of different dimensions for extended periods of time, we have shown that it is possible to obtain the probability of a molecule entering the contact, the change in its diffusion upon entry, and the impact of spatial heterogeneity of adhesion protein density in the contact. By analyzing the contacts formed by a T cell interacting with adhesion proteins anchored to a supported lipid bilayer, we find that probes are excluded from contact entry in a size-dependent manner for gap-to-probe differences of 4.1 nm. We also observed probes being trapped inside the contact and a decrease in diffusion of up to 85% in dense adhesion protein contacts. This approach provides new, to our knowledge, insights into the nature of cell-cell contacts, revealing that cell contacts are highly heterogeneous because of topography- and protein-density-related processes. These effects are likely to profoundly influence signaling between cells.
spellingShingle Kulenkampff, K
Lippert, AH
McColl, J
Santos, AF
Ponjavic, A
Jenkins, E
Humphrey, J
Winkel, A
Franze, K
Lee, SF
Davis, SJ
Klenerman, D
The costs of close contacts: visualizing the energy landscape of cell contacts at the nanoscale
title The costs of close contacts: visualizing the energy landscape of cell contacts at the nanoscale
title_full The costs of close contacts: visualizing the energy landscape of cell contacts at the nanoscale
title_fullStr The costs of close contacts: visualizing the energy landscape of cell contacts at the nanoscale
title_full_unstemmed The costs of close contacts: visualizing the energy landscape of cell contacts at the nanoscale
title_short The costs of close contacts: visualizing the energy landscape of cell contacts at the nanoscale
title_sort costs of close contacts visualizing the energy landscape of cell contacts at the nanoscale
work_keys_str_mv AT kulenkampffk thecostsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT lippertah thecostsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT mccollj thecostsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT santosaf thecostsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT ponjavica thecostsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT jenkinse thecostsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT humphreyj thecostsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT winkela thecostsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT franzek thecostsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT leesf thecostsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT davissj thecostsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT klenermand thecostsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT kulenkampffk costsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT lippertah costsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT mccollj costsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT santosaf costsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT ponjavica costsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT jenkinse costsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT humphreyj costsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT winkela costsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT franzek costsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT leesf costsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT davissj costsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale
AT klenermand costsofclosecontactsvisualizingtheenergylandscapeofcellcontactsatthenanoscale