Reply to Stojanowski et al, "Contesting the massacre at Nataruk".

In the accompanying Comment1, Stojanowski et al. challenge the evidence for inter-group conflict at Nataruk2. They make two arguments — first, that the lesions in three crania are due to soil compression; second, that there is a correlation between body position and age, reflecting different burial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Lahr, M, Rivera, F, Power, R, Mounier, A, Copsey, B, Crivellaro, F, Edung, J, Maillo Fernandez, J, Kiarie, C, Lawrence, J, Leakey, A, Mbua, E, Miller, H, Muigai, A, Mukhongo, D, Van Baelen, A, Wood, R, Schwenninger, J, Grün, R, Achyuthan, H, Wilshaw, A, Foley, R
Format:	Journal article
Language:	English
Published:	Nature Publishing Group 2016

Reply to Stojanowski et al, "Contesting the massacre at Nataruk".

Similar Items