Reply to Stojanowski et al, "Contesting the massacre at Nataruk".
In the accompanying Comment1, Stojanowski et al. challenge the evidence for inter-group conflict at Nataruk2. They make two arguments — first, that the lesions in three crania are due to soil compression; second, that there is a correlation between body position and age, reflecting different burial...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Journal article |
| 語言: | English |
| 出版: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
| 總結: | In the accompanying Comment1, Stojanowski et al. challenge the evidence for inter-group conflict at Nataruk2. They make two arguments — first, that the lesions in three crania are due to soil compression; second, that there is a correlation between body position and age, reflecting different burial traditions. We believe that their interpretation is incorrect on both counts |
|---|