Reply to Stojanowski et al, "Contesting the massacre at Nataruk".
In the accompanying Comment1, Stojanowski et al. challenge the evidence for inter-group conflict at Nataruk2. They make two arguments — first, that the lesions in three crania are due to soil compression; second, that there is a correlation between body position and age, reflecting different burial...
Main Authors: | Lahr, M, Rivera, F, Power, R, Mounier, A, Copsey, B, Crivellaro, F, Edung, J, Maillo Fernandez, J, Kiarie, C, Lawrence, J, Leakey, A, Mbua, E, Miller, H, Muigai, A, Mukhongo, D, Van Baelen, A, Wood, R, Schwenninger, J, Grün, R, Achyuthan, H, Wilshaw, A, Foley, R |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Similar Items
-
A new Upper Pleistocene hominin calvarium from West-Turkana (Kenya)
by: Aurélien Mounier, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Massacre do Carandiru: vinte anos sem responsabilização
by: Luisa M. A. Ferreira, et al.
Published: (2012-11-01) -
The Maguindanao Massacre
by: France Jeanne L Sarmiento
Published: (2013-04-01) -
UNDERSTANDING THE BULHOEK MASSACRE: VOICES AFTER THE MASSACRE AND DOWN THE YEARS
by: D.H. Makobe
Published: (2012-02-01) -
The place of the Bulhoek massacre in South African history
by: Robert R. Edgar
Published: (2023-10-01)