Reply to Stojanowski et al, "Contesting the massacre at Nataruk".
In the accompanying Comment1, Stojanowski et al. challenge the evidence for inter-group conflict at Nataruk2. They make two arguments — first, that the lesions in three crania are due to soil compression; second, that there is a correlation between body position and age, reflecting different burial...
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | Lahr, M, Rivera, F, Power, R, Mounier, A, Copsey, B, Crivellaro, F, Edung, J, Maillo Fernandez, J, Kiarie, C, Lawrence, J, Leakey, A, Mbua, E, Miller, H, Muigai, A, Mukhongo, D, Van Baelen, A, Wood, R, Schwenninger, J, Grün, R, Achyuthan, H, Wilshaw, A, Foley, R |
---|---|
التنسيق: | Journal article |
اللغة: | English |
منشور في: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
مواد مشابهة
-
A new Upper Pleistocene hominin calvarium from West-Turkana (Kenya)
حسب: Aurélien Mounier, وآخرون
منشور في: (2020-12-01) -
Massacre do Carandiru: vinte anos sem responsabilização
حسب: Luisa M. A. Ferreira, وآخرون
منشور في: (2012-11-01) -
The Maguindanao Massacre
حسب: France Jeanne L Sarmiento
منشور في: (2013-04-01) -
UNDERSTANDING THE BULHOEK MASSACRE: VOICES AFTER THE MASSACRE AND DOWN THE YEARS
حسب: D.H. Makobe
منشور في: (2012-02-01) -
The place of the Bulhoek massacre in South African history
حسب: Robert R. Edgar
منشور في: (2023-10-01)