Reply to Stojanowski et al, "Contesting the massacre at Nataruk".
In the accompanying Comment1, Stojanowski et al. challenge the evidence for inter-group conflict at Nataruk2. They make two arguments — first, that the lesions in three crania are due to soil compression; second, that there is a correlation between body position and age, reflecting different burial...
Հիմնական հեղինակներ: | Lahr, M, Rivera, F, Power, R, Mounier, A, Copsey, B, Crivellaro, F, Edung, J, Maillo Fernandez, J, Kiarie, C, Lawrence, J, Leakey, A, Mbua, E, Miller, H, Muigai, A, Mukhongo, D, Van Baelen, A, Wood, R, Schwenninger, J, Grün, R, Achyuthan, H, Wilshaw, A, Foley, R |
---|---|
Ձևաչափ: | Journal article |
Լեզու: | English |
Հրապարակվել է: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Նմանատիպ նյութեր
-
A new Upper Pleistocene hominin calvarium from West-Turkana (Kenya)
: Aurélien Mounier, և այլն
Հրապարակվել է: (2020-12-01) -
Massacre do Carandiru: vinte anos sem responsabilização
: Luisa M. A. Ferreira, և այլն
Հրապարակվել է: (2012-11-01) -
The Maguindanao Massacre
: France Jeanne L Sarmiento
Հրապարակվել է: (2013-04-01) -
UNDERSTANDING THE BULHOEK MASSACRE: VOICES AFTER THE MASSACRE AND DOWN THE YEARS
: D.H. Makobe
Հրապարակվել է: (2012-02-01) -
The place of the Bulhoek massacre in South African history
: Robert R. Edgar
Հրապարակվել է: (2023-10-01)