The puzzling nuanced status of who free relative clauses in English: a follow-up to Patterson and Caponigro (2015)
This squib challenges Patterson & Caponigro's (2015, this journal) claim that there are few acceptable free relative clauses with who. We show that free relatives with who are generally acceptable when they are ‘transparent’ free relatives or complements of a copula, and add further nuance...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Journal article |
| 语言: | English |
| 出版: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
| _version_ | 1826300099591929856 |
|---|---|
| author | Stockwell, R Schütze, CT |
| author_facet | Stockwell, R Schütze, CT |
| author_sort | Stockwell, R |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | This squib challenges Patterson & Caponigro's (2015, this journal) claim that there are few acceptable free relative clauses with who. We show that free relatives with who are generally acceptable when they are ‘transparent’ free relatives or complements of a copula, and add further nuance to their findings concerning how the degree of acceptability of free relatives with who varies according to positional factors. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:12:00Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:dbdf8ae1-0d0f-4787-8b25-b1f87e5e8f9a |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:12:00Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:dbdf8ae1-0d0f-4787-8b25-b1f87e5e8f9a2022-03-27T09:13:49ZThe puzzling nuanced status of who free relative clauses in English: a follow-up to Patterson and Caponigro (2015)Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:dbdf8ae1-0d0f-4787-8b25-b1f87e5e8f9aEnglishSymplectic ElementsCambridge University Press2021Stockwell, RSchütze, CTThis squib challenges Patterson & Caponigro's (2015, this journal) claim that there are few acceptable free relative clauses with who. We show that free relatives with who are generally acceptable when they are ‘transparent’ free relatives or complements of a copula, and add further nuance to their findings concerning how the degree of acceptability of free relatives with who varies according to positional factors. |
| spellingShingle | Stockwell, R Schütze, CT The puzzling nuanced status of who free relative clauses in English: a follow-up to Patterson and Caponigro (2015) |
| title | The puzzling nuanced status of who free relative clauses in English: a follow-up to Patterson and Caponigro (2015) |
| title_full | The puzzling nuanced status of who free relative clauses in English: a follow-up to Patterson and Caponigro (2015) |
| title_fullStr | The puzzling nuanced status of who free relative clauses in English: a follow-up to Patterson and Caponigro (2015) |
| title_full_unstemmed | The puzzling nuanced status of who free relative clauses in English: a follow-up to Patterson and Caponigro (2015) |
| title_short | The puzzling nuanced status of who free relative clauses in English: a follow-up to Patterson and Caponigro (2015) |
| title_sort | puzzling nuanced status of who free relative clauses in english a follow up to patterson and caponigro 2015 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stockwellr thepuzzlingnuancedstatusofwhofreerelativeclausesinenglishafollowuptopattersonandcaponigro2015 AT schutzect thepuzzlingnuancedstatusofwhofreerelativeclausesinenglishafollowuptopattersonandcaponigro2015 AT stockwellr puzzlingnuancedstatusofwhofreerelativeclausesinenglishafollowuptopattersonandcaponigro2015 AT schutzect puzzlingnuancedstatusofwhofreerelativeclausesinenglishafollowuptopattersonandcaponigro2015 |