Skip to content
VuFind
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
日本語
Nederlands
Português
Português (Brasil)
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Türkçe
עברית
Gaeilge
Cymraeg
Ελληνικά
Català
Euskara
Русский
Čeština
Suomi
Svenska
polski
Dansk
slovenščina
اللغة العربية
বাংলা
Galego
Tiếng Việt
Hrvatski
हिंदी
Հայերէն
Українська
Sámegiella
Монгол
Language
All Fields
Title
Author
Subject
Call Number
ISBN/ISSN
Tag
Find
Advanced
Apples and oranges: comparison...
Cite this
Text this
Email this
Print
Export Record
Export to RefWorks
Export to EndNoteWeb
Export to EndNote
Permanent link
Apples and oranges: comparison of treatment methods for prostate cancer using biochemical recurrence as an endpoint.
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:
Sooriakumaran, P
,
Spahn, M
,
Wiklund, P
Format:
Journal article
Language:
English
Published:
2012
Holdings
Description
Similar Items
Staff View
Similar Items
Defining biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a proposal for a standardized definition.
by: Stephenson, A, et al.
Published: (2006)
Imaging tumor lactate is feasible for identifying intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients with postsurgical biochemical recurrence
by: Sushentsev, N, et al.
Published: (2023)
Tumor volume is a valid surrogate endpoint for defining clinically significant prostate cancers.
by: Hugosson, J, et al.
Published: (2001)
Radical therapy may reduce mortality in men with metastatic prostate cancer
by: Sooriakumaran, P, et al.
Published: (2014)
Reply from authors re: Anders Bjartell "a robot saved my life": Is it a myth? Eur Urol 2012;62:775-6: The debate on the oncologic safety of robotics in prostate cancer is over: Time to move on
by: Sooriakumaran, P, et al.
Published: (2012)