Living with moral disagreement

This paper argues that suspension of judgement is the appropriate response to disagreement about ultimate moral principles, and outlines the implications of such a response. It begins with an argument influenced by Sextus and Sidgwick for the rationality of suspension, and then illustrates fundament...

Descrizione completa

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Crisp, R
Natura: Journal article
Lingua:English
Pubblicazione: Springer Verlag 2020

Documenti analoghi