Living with moral disagreement
This paper argues that suspension of judgement is the appropriate response to disagreement about ultimate moral principles, and outlines the implications of such a response. It begins with an argument influenced by Sextus and Sidgwick for the rationality of suspension, and then illustrates fundament...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal article |
| Idioma: | English |
| Publicado em: |
Springer Verlag
2020
|