Discrepancies in meta-analyses answering the same clinical question were hard to explain: a meta-epidemiological study
Objectives To systematically explore the methodological factors underpinning discrepancies in the pooled effect estimates from Cochrane reviews (CRs) and non-Cochrane reviews (NCRs) systematic reviews, answering the same clinical question. <br></br>Study Design and Setting Quantitative...
मुख्य लेखकों: | Hacke, C, Nunan, D |
---|---|
स्वरूप: | Journal article |
भाषा: | English |
प्रकाशित: |
Elsevier
2019
|
समान संसाधन
-
LAPAROSCOPIC ANTIREFLUX SURGERY: WERE OLD QUESTIONS ANSWERED? PARTIAL OR TOTAL FUNDOPLICATION?
द्वारा: Marco Ettore Allaix, और अन्य
प्रकाशित: (2023-07-01) -
Modernist High-Rises in Postwar Antwerp. Two Answers to the same Question
द्वारा: Els De Vos, और अन्य
प्रकाशित: (2017-03-01) -
The wh-questions of network meta-analyses
द्वारा: De Giorgi, R
प्रकाशित: (2019) -
The wh-questions of network meta-analyses
द्वारा: De Giorgi, R
प्रकाशित: (2019) -
Can simply answering research questions change behaviour? Systematic review and meta analyses of brief alcohol intervention trials.
द्वारा: Jim McCambridge, और अन्य
प्रकाशित: (2011-01-01)