The right to life and the Jus ad Bellum: belligerent equality and the duty to prosecute acts of aggression
General Comment 36 of the Human Rights Committee, adopted in 2018, asserts that ‘States parties engaged in acts of aggression as defined in international law, resulting in deprivation of life, violate ipso facto article 6 of the Covenant.’ One question about this claim is whether it reduces incentiv...
主要な著者: | Jackson, M, Akande, D |
---|---|
フォーマット: | Journal article |
言語: | English |
出版事項: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
類似資料
-
Moral equality of soldiers in war: Necessity of separating jus ad bellum from jus in bello
著者:: Stanar Dragan
出版事項: (2016-01-01) -
Derogation and the scope of the jus cogens norm in the jus ad bellum
著者:: Johnston, K
出版事項: (2018) -
Soft Law in Jus in Bello and Jus ad Bellum: What Lessons for Business and Human Rights?
著者:: Alonso Gurmendi Dunkelberg
出版事項: (2020-01-01) -
In Defense of the “Conventional Account” of the Jus ad Bellum
著者:: Tess Bridgeman
出版事項: (2018-01-01) -
Environmental Ethics of War: Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello, and the Natural Environment
著者:: Tamar Meisels
出版事項: (2023-12-01)