A comparison between structural equation modelling (SEM) and Bayesian SEM approaches on in-store behaviour

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of atmospherics and affective state on shoppers’ in-store behaviour using the two approaches in structural equation modelling (SEM), i.e. Frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Shoppers’ affective state was tested for its mediating effect on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Osman, Syuhaily, Ong, Fon Sim, Yeoh, Ken Kyid, Khong, Kok Wei, Mohd. Nor, Othman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Group Publishing 2018
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/72888/1/CHAIN.pdf
_version_ 1825950157772947456
author Osman, Syuhaily
Ong, Fon Sim
Yeoh, Ken Kyid
Khong, Kok Wei
Mohd. Nor, Othman
author_facet Osman, Syuhaily
Ong, Fon Sim
Yeoh, Ken Kyid
Khong, Kok Wei
Mohd. Nor, Othman
author_sort Osman, Syuhaily
collection UPM
description Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of atmospherics and affective state on shoppers’ in-store behaviour using the two approaches in structural equation modelling (SEM), i.e. Frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Shoppers’ affective state was tested for its mediating effect on in-store shopping behaviour. Design/methodology/approach: The final sample consists of 382 respondents who were drawn from shoppers at selected apparel stores in six of the most popular shopping malls around Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia). A frequentist approach to SEM is common among researchers and offers generally an analysis of the relationships between multiple latent variables and constructs. Alternatively, the Bayesian SEM (BSEM) approach stems from the diffusion of the model’s posterior distributions using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique. More specifically, this technique is inherently more flexible and substantive in determining parameter estimates as compared to the more conventional, the frequentist approach to SEM. Findings: The results show the mixed effects of atmospheric cues in retail setting on shoppers’ affective state. More specifically, the positive direct effect of atmospheric cues (music) on in-store behaviour was confirmed while other atmospheric cues (colour and store layout) were found to be fully mediated by affective state. The Bayesian approach was able to offer more distinctive results complementing the frequentist approach. Research limitations/implications: Although the current sample size is adequate, it will be interesting to examine how a bigger sample size and different antecedents of in-store behaviour in retailing can affect the comparison between the frequentist approach in SEM and BSEM. Practical implications: The authors found that a combination of well-designed store atmospherics and layout store can produce pleasurable effects on shoppers resulting in positive affective state. This study found that results from both frequentist and Bayesian approaches complement each other and it may be beneficial for future studies to utilise both approaches in SEM. Originality/value: This paper met the aim to compare the approaches in SEM and the need to consider both approaches on in-store shopping environment. Overall, the authors contend that the Bayesian approach to SEM is a potentially viable alternative to frequentist SEM, especially when studies are conducted under dynamic conditions such as apparel retailing.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T10:10:20Z
format Article
id upm.eprints-72888
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T10:10:20Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Emerald Group Publishing
record_format dspace
spelling upm.eprints-728882021-02-12T08:33:21Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/72888/ A comparison between structural equation modelling (SEM) and Bayesian SEM approaches on in-store behaviour Osman, Syuhaily Ong, Fon Sim Yeoh, Ken Kyid Khong, Kok Wei Mohd. Nor, Othman Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of atmospherics and affective state on shoppers’ in-store behaviour using the two approaches in structural equation modelling (SEM), i.e. Frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Shoppers’ affective state was tested for its mediating effect on in-store shopping behaviour. Design/methodology/approach: The final sample consists of 382 respondents who were drawn from shoppers at selected apparel stores in six of the most popular shopping malls around Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia). A frequentist approach to SEM is common among researchers and offers generally an analysis of the relationships between multiple latent variables and constructs. Alternatively, the Bayesian SEM (BSEM) approach stems from the diffusion of the model’s posterior distributions using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique. More specifically, this technique is inherently more flexible and substantive in determining parameter estimates as compared to the more conventional, the frequentist approach to SEM. Findings: The results show the mixed effects of atmospheric cues in retail setting on shoppers’ affective state. More specifically, the positive direct effect of atmospheric cues (music) on in-store behaviour was confirmed while other atmospheric cues (colour and store layout) were found to be fully mediated by affective state. The Bayesian approach was able to offer more distinctive results complementing the frequentist approach. Research limitations/implications: Although the current sample size is adequate, it will be interesting to examine how a bigger sample size and different antecedents of in-store behaviour in retailing can affect the comparison between the frequentist approach in SEM and BSEM. Practical implications: The authors found that a combination of well-designed store atmospherics and layout store can produce pleasurable effects on shoppers resulting in positive affective state. This study found that results from both frequentist and Bayesian approaches complement each other and it may be beneficial for future studies to utilise both approaches in SEM. Originality/value: This paper met the aim to compare the approaches in SEM and the need to consider both approaches on in-store shopping environment. Overall, the authors contend that the Bayesian approach to SEM is a potentially viable alternative to frequentist SEM, especially when studies are conducted under dynamic conditions such as apparel retailing. Emerald Group Publishing 2018 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/72888/1/CHAIN.pdf Osman, Syuhaily and Ong, Fon Sim and Yeoh, Ken Kyid and Khong, Kok Wei and Mohd. Nor, Othman (2018) A comparison between structural equation modelling (SEM) and Bayesian SEM approaches on in-store behaviour. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 118 (1). 41 - 64. ISSN 0263-5577 https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IMDS-10-2016-0423/full/html 10.1108/IMDS-10-2016-0423
spellingShingle Osman, Syuhaily
Ong, Fon Sim
Yeoh, Ken Kyid
Khong, Kok Wei
Mohd. Nor, Othman
A comparison between structural equation modelling (SEM) and Bayesian SEM approaches on in-store behaviour
title A comparison between structural equation modelling (SEM) and Bayesian SEM approaches on in-store behaviour
title_full A comparison between structural equation modelling (SEM) and Bayesian SEM approaches on in-store behaviour
title_fullStr A comparison between structural equation modelling (SEM) and Bayesian SEM approaches on in-store behaviour
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between structural equation modelling (SEM) and Bayesian SEM approaches on in-store behaviour
title_short A comparison between structural equation modelling (SEM) and Bayesian SEM approaches on in-store behaviour
title_sort comparison between structural equation modelling sem and bayesian sem approaches on in store behaviour
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/72888/1/CHAIN.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT osmansyuhaily acomparisonbetweenstructuralequationmodellingsemandbayesiansemapproachesoninstorebehaviour
AT ongfonsim acomparisonbetweenstructuralequationmodellingsemandbayesiansemapproachesoninstorebehaviour
AT yeohkenkyid acomparisonbetweenstructuralequationmodellingsemandbayesiansemapproachesoninstorebehaviour
AT khongkokwei acomparisonbetweenstructuralequationmodellingsemandbayesiansemapproachesoninstorebehaviour
AT mohdnorothman acomparisonbetweenstructuralequationmodellingsemandbayesiansemapproachesoninstorebehaviour
AT osmansyuhaily comparisonbetweenstructuralequationmodellingsemandbayesiansemapproachesoninstorebehaviour
AT ongfonsim comparisonbetweenstructuralequationmodellingsemandbayesiansemapproachesoninstorebehaviour
AT yeohkenkyid comparisonbetweenstructuralequationmodellingsemandbayesiansemapproachesoninstorebehaviour
AT khongkokwei comparisonbetweenstructuralequationmodellingsemandbayesiansemapproachesoninstorebehaviour
AT mohdnorothman comparisonbetweenstructuralequationmodellingsemandbayesiansemapproachesoninstorebehaviour