Gender boardroom quotas: a survey of Malaysian corporate directors

A number of countries have introduced gender boardroom quotas by which firms are required to appoint at least a certain number or proportion of women to their boards. Subsequently, the government of Malaysia, in 2011, introduced the policy of having at least 30 percent women on corporate boards. Thi...

Mô tả đầy đủ

Chi tiết về thư mục
Những tác giả chính: Ku Ismail, Ku Nor Izah, Mustapa, Ifa Rizad, Abd Rahman, Intan Maiza, Abdullah, Shamsul Nahar
Định dạng: Bài viết
Ngôn ngữ:English
Được phát hành: Universiti Malaysia Sarawak 2019
Những chủ đề:
Truy cập trực tuyến:https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/26699/1/IJBS%2020%203%202019%20968%20983.pdf
_version_ 1825805520757325824
author Ku Ismail, Ku Nor Izah
Mustapa, Ifa Rizad
Abd Rahman, Intan Maiza
Abdullah, Shamsul Nahar
author_facet Ku Ismail, Ku Nor Izah
Mustapa, Ifa Rizad
Abd Rahman, Intan Maiza
Abdullah, Shamsul Nahar
author_sort Ku Ismail, Ku Nor Izah
collection UUM
description A number of countries have introduced gender boardroom quotas by which firms are required to appoint at least a certain number or proportion of women to their boards. Subsequently, the government of Malaysia, in 2011, introduced the policy of having at least 30 percent women on corporate boards. This study seeks the opinion of corporate directors on whether they are supportive of the policy. In addition, we examine if the characteristics of the respondents influence their opinion. A questionnaire survey was conducted on a sample of 84 directors who sit on the boards of listed companies in Malaysia. A majority of the respondents believe that there should not be any quota for both genders. Some of the respondents comment that it is not gender that matters; what is more important is the quality of individuals who sit on the board. We find that women are indifferent, while a majority of the men do not agree with the policy. In addition, directors who have a family relationship with any other directors tend not to favour the policy, compared to those who do not have any family relationship. We also find that a majority of the respondents do not agree that women directors could enhance firm financial performance and social responsibility activities; neither do a majority of them agree that women could curb unethical conducts. This study is important to the policymakers in that the results provide insights on the issue of whether the 30 percent quota is necessary.
first_indexed 2024-07-04T06:33:42Z
format Article
id uum-26699
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-07-04T06:33:42Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
record_format eprints
spelling uum-266992020-01-08T03:25:00Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/26699/ Gender boardroom quotas: a survey of Malaysian corporate directors Ku Ismail, Ku Nor Izah Mustapa, Ifa Rizad Abd Rahman, Intan Maiza Abdullah, Shamsul Nahar HC Economic History and Conditions A number of countries have introduced gender boardroom quotas by which firms are required to appoint at least a certain number or proportion of women to their boards. Subsequently, the government of Malaysia, in 2011, introduced the policy of having at least 30 percent women on corporate boards. This study seeks the opinion of corporate directors on whether they are supportive of the policy. In addition, we examine if the characteristics of the respondents influence their opinion. A questionnaire survey was conducted on a sample of 84 directors who sit on the boards of listed companies in Malaysia. A majority of the respondents believe that there should not be any quota for both genders. Some of the respondents comment that it is not gender that matters; what is more important is the quality of individuals who sit on the board. We find that women are indifferent, while a majority of the men do not agree with the policy. In addition, directors who have a family relationship with any other directors tend not to favour the policy, compared to those who do not have any family relationship. We also find that a majority of the respondents do not agree that women directors could enhance firm financial performance and social responsibility activities; neither do a majority of them agree that women could curb unethical conducts. This study is important to the policymakers in that the results provide insights on the issue of whether the 30 percent quota is necessary. Universiti Malaysia Sarawak 2019 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/26699/1/IJBS%2020%203%202019%20968%20983.pdf Ku Ismail, Ku Nor Izah and Mustapa, Ifa Rizad and Abd Rahman, Intan Maiza and Abdullah, Shamsul Nahar (2019) Gender boardroom quotas: a survey of Malaysian corporate directors. International Journal of Business and Society, 20 (3). pp. 968-983. ISSN 1511-6670 http://www.ijbs.unimas.my/index.php/content-abstract/current-issue
spellingShingle HC Economic History and Conditions
Ku Ismail, Ku Nor Izah
Mustapa, Ifa Rizad
Abd Rahman, Intan Maiza
Abdullah, Shamsul Nahar
Gender boardroom quotas: a survey of Malaysian corporate directors
title Gender boardroom quotas: a survey of Malaysian corporate directors
title_full Gender boardroom quotas: a survey of Malaysian corporate directors
title_fullStr Gender boardroom quotas: a survey of Malaysian corporate directors
title_full_unstemmed Gender boardroom quotas: a survey of Malaysian corporate directors
title_short Gender boardroom quotas: a survey of Malaysian corporate directors
title_sort gender boardroom quotas a survey of malaysian corporate directors
topic HC Economic History and Conditions
url https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/26699/1/IJBS%2020%203%202019%20968%20983.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kuismailkunorizah genderboardroomquotasasurveyofmalaysiancorporatedirectors
AT mustapaifarizad genderboardroomquotasasurveyofmalaysiancorporatedirectors
AT abdrahmanintanmaiza genderboardroomquotasasurveyofmalaysiancorporatedirectors
AT abdullahshamsulnahar genderboardroomquotasasurveyofmalaysiancorporatedirectors