Gender boardroom quotas: a survey of Malaysian corporate directors
A number of countries have introduced gender boardroom quotas by which firms are required to appoint at least a certain number or proportion of women to their boards. Subsequently, the government of Malaysia, in 2011, introduced the policy of having at least 30 percent women on corporate boards. Thi...
Những tác giả chính: | , , , |
---|---|
Định dạng: | Bài viết |
Ngôn ngữ: | English |
Được phát hành: |
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
2019
|
Những chủ đề: | |
Truy cập trực tuyến: | https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/26699/1/IJBS%2020%203%202019%20968%20983.pdf |
_version_ | 1825805520757325824 |
---|---|
author | Ku Ismail, Ku Nor Izah Mustapa, Ifa Rizad Abd Rahman, Intan Maiza Abdullah, Shamsul Nahar |
author_facet | Ku Ismail, Ku Nor Izah Mustapa, Ifa Rizad Abd Rahman, Intan Maiza Abdullah, Shamsul Nahar |
author_sort | Ku Ismail, Ku Nor Izah |
collection | UUM |
description | A number of countries have introduced gender boardroom quotas by which firms are required to appoint at least a certain number or proportion of women to their boards. Subsequently, the government of Malaysia, in 2011, introduced the policy of having at least 30 percent women on corporate boards. This study seeks the opinion of corporate directors on whether they are supportive of the policy. In addition, we examine if the
characteristics of the respondents influence their opinion. A questionnaire survey was conducted on a sample of 84 directors who sit on the boards of listed companies in Malaysia. A majority of the respondents believe that there should not be any quota for both genders. Some of the respondents comment that it is not gender that matters; what is more important is the quality of individuals who sit on the board. We find that women are indifferent, while a majority of the men do not agree with the policy. In addition, directors who have a family relationship with any other directors tend not to favour the policy, compared to those who do not have any family relationship. We also find that a majority of the respondents do not agree that women directors could enhance firm financial performance and social responsibility activities; neither do a majority of them
agree that women could curb unethical conducts. This study is important to the policymakers in that the results provide insights on the issue of whether the 30 percent quota is necessary. |
first_indexed | 2024-07-04T06:33:42Z |
format | Article |
id | uum-26699 |
institution | Universiti Utara Malaysia |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-07-04T06:33:42Z |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Universiti Malaysia Sarawak |
record_format | eprints |
spelling | uum-266992020-01-08T03:25:00Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/26699/ Gender boardroom quotas: a survey of Malaysian corporate directors Ku Ismail, Ku Nor Izah Mustapa, Ifa Rizad Abd Rahman, Intan Maiza Abdullah, Shamsul Nahar HC Economic History and Conditions A number of countries have introduced gender boardroom quotas by which firms are required to appoint at least a certain number or proportion of women to their boards. Subsequently, the government of Malaysia, in 2011, introduced the policy of having at least 30 percent women on corporate boards. This study seeks the opinion of corporate directors on whether they are supportive of the policy. In addition, we examine if the characteristics of the respondents influence their opinion. A questionnaire survey was conducted on a sample of 84 directors who sit on the boards of listed companies in Malaysia. A majority of the respondents believe that there should not be any quota for both genders. Some of the respondents comment that it is not gender that matters; what is more important is the quality of individuals who sit on the board. We find that women are indifferent, while a majority of the men do not agree with the policy. In addition, directors who have a family relationship with any other directors tend not to favour the policy, compared to those who do not have any family relationship. We also find that a majority of the respondents do not agree that women directors could enhance firm financial performance and social responsibility activities; neither do a majority of them agree that women could curb unethical conducts. This study is important to the policymakers in that the results provide insights on the issue of whether the 30 percent quota is necessary. Universiti Malaysia Sarawak 2019 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/26699/1/IJBS%2020%203%202019%20968%20983.pdf Ku Ismail, Ku Nor Izah and Mustapa, Ifa Rizad and Abd Rahman, Intan Maiza and Abdullah, Shamsul Nahar (2019) Gender boardroom quotas: a survey of Malaysian corporate directors. International Journal of Business and Society, 20 (3). pp. 968-983. ISSN 1511-6670 http://www.ijbs.unimas.my/index.php/content-abstract/current-issue |
spellingShingle | HC Economic History and Conditions Ku Ismail, Ku Nor Izah Mustapa, Ifa Rizad Abd Rahman, Intan Maiza Abdullah, Shamsul Nahar Gender boardroom quotas: a survey of Malaysian corporate directors |
title | Gender boardroom quotas: a survey of Malaysian corporate directors |
title_full | Gender boardroom quotas: a survey of Malaysian corporate directors |
title_fullStr | Gender boardroom quotas: a survey of Malaysian corporate directors |
title_full_unstemmed | Gender boardroom quotas: a survey of Malaysian corporate directors |
title_short | Gender boardroom quotas: a survey of Malaysian corporate directors |
title_sort | gender boardroom quotas a survey of malaysian corporate directors |
topic | HC Economic History and Conditions |
url | https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/26699/1/IJBS%2020%203%202019%20968%20983.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuismailkunorizah genderboardroomquotasasurveyofmalaysiancorporatedirectors AT mustapaifarizad genderboardroomquotasasurveyofmalaysiancorporatedirectors AT abdrahmanintanmaiza genderboardroomquotasasurveyofmalaysiancorporatedirectors AT abdullahshamsulnahar genderboardroomquotasasurveyofmalaysiancorporatedirectors |