Very large treatment effects in randomised trials as an empirical marker to indicate whether subsequent trials are necessary: meta-epidemiological assessment
<strong>Objective:</strong> Most healthcare interventions provide modest benefits, but occasionally trials report very large improvements over existing treatments or inactive controls. This often leads to speculation that further trials may be unnecessary. We examined whether a very larg...
Hoofdauteurs: | Nagendran, M, Pereira, T, Kiew, G, Altman, D, Maruthappu, M, Ioannidis, J, McCulloch, P |
---|---|
Formaat: | Journal article |
Taal: | English |
Gepubliceerd in: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Gelijkaardige items
-
Poor adherence of randomised trials in surgery to CONSORT guidelines for non-pharmacological treatments (NPT): a cross-sectional study
door: Nagendran, M, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2013) -
Epidemiology of recent randomised controlled trials
door: Chan, A, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2003) -
Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials
door: Chan, A, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2003) -
Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals.
door: Chan, A, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2005) -
THEORETICAL STUDY OF REGIONAL STRATEGIES: WHETHER THEY ARE NECESSARY?
door: VLADIMIR YURIEVICH Malov
Gepubliceerd in: (2018-04-01)