Very large treatment effects in randomised trials as an empirical marker to indicate whether subsequent trials are necessary: meta-epidemiological assessment
<strong>Objective:</strong> Most healthcare interventions provide modest benefits, but occasionally trials report very large improvements over existing treatments or inactive controls. This often leads to speculation that further trials may be unnecessary. We examined whether a very larg...
Główni autorzy: | Nagendran, M, Pereira, T, Kiew, G, Altman, D, Maruthappu, M, Ioannidis, J, McCulloch, P |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Język: | English |
Wydane: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Podobne zapisy
-
Poor adherence of randomised trials in surgery to CONSORT guidelines for non-pharmacological treatments (NPT): a cross-sectional study
od: Nagendran, M, i wsp.
Wydane: (2013) -
Epidemiology of recent randomised controlled trials
od: Chan, A, i wsp.
Wydane: (2003) -
Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials
od: Chan, A, i wsp.
Wydane: (2003) -
Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals.
od: Chan, A, i wsp.
Wydane: (2005) -
THEORETICAL STUDY OF REGIONAL STRATEGIES: WHETHER THEY ARE NECESSARY?
od: VLADIMIR YURIEVICH Malov
Wydane: (2018-04-01)