Reply to Stojanowski et al, "Contesting the massacre at Nataruk".
In the accompanying Comment1, Stojanowski et al. challenge the evidence for inter-group conflict at Nataruk2. They make two arguments — first, that the lesions in three crania are due to soil compression; second, that there is a correlation between body position and age, reflecting different burial...
Main Authors: | Lahr, M, Rivera, F, Power, R, Mounier, A, Copsey, B, Crivellaro, F, Edung, J, Maillo Fernandez, J, Kiarie, C, Lawrence, J, Leakey, A, Mbua, E, Miller, H, Muigai, A, Mukhongo, D, Van Baelen, A, Wood, R, Schwenninger, J, Grün, R, Achyuthan, H, Wilshaw, A, Foley, R |
---|---|
פורמט: | Journal article |
שפה: | English |
יצא לאור: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
פריטים דומים
-
A new Upper Pleistocene hominin calvarium from West-Turkana (Kenya)
מאת: Aurélien Mounier, et al.
יצא לאור: (2020-12-01) -
Massacre do Carandiru: vinte anos sem responsabilização
מאת: Luisa M. A. Ferreira, et al.
יצא לאור: (2012-11-01) -
The Maguindanao Massacre
מאת: France Jeanne L Sarmiento
יצא לאור: (2013-04-01) -
UNDERSTANDING THE BULHOEK MASSACRE: VOICES AFTER THE MASSACRE AND DOWN THE YEARS
מאת: D.H. Makobe
יצא לאור: (2012-02-01) -
The place of the Bulhoek massacre in South African history
מאת: Robert R. Edgar
יצא לאור: (2023-10-01)