Reply to Stojanowski et al, "Contesting the massacre at Nataruk".

Reply to Stojanowski et al, "Contesting the massacre at Nataruk".

In the accompanying Comment1, Stojanowski et al. challenge the evidence for inter-group conflict at Nataruk2. They make two arguments — first, that the lesions in three crania are due to soil compression; second, that there is a correlation between body position and age, reflecting different burial...

Полное описание

Библиографические подробности
Главные авторы: Lahr, M, Rivera, F, Power, R, Mounier, A, Copsey, B, Crivellaro, F, Edung, J, Maillo Fernandez, J, Kiarie, C, Lawrence, J, Leakey, A, Mbua, E, Miller, H, Muigai, A, Mukhongo, D, Van Baelen, A, Wood, R, Schwenninger, J, Grün, R, Achyuthan, H, Wilshaw, A, Foley, R
Формат: Journal article
Язык:English
Опубликовано: Nature Publishing Group 2016

Схожие документы

Схожие документы